Stuart's Blog

The Curse of Hyperdimensionality: And How LLMs Just Vibes’d Right Past It

Somewhere deep in the lore of data science and machine learning, there’s a terrifying phrase that haunts every grad student’s dreams: the curse of dimensionality. It’s not just scary—it’s practically evil. As dimensions increase, everything breaks. Distance metrics collapse. Volume explodes. Intuition dies. Algorithms cry.

In high-dimensional space, the notion of "closeness" becomes useless. Want to use k-nearest neighbors in 1,000 dimensions? Good luck—every point is basically equidistant. Want to model anything with a normal distribution? Hope you enjoy waiting forever for enough data. The curse makes even simple problems turn into computational monsters.

But then… Large Language Models (LLMs) happened. They swim in vector spaces with thousands of dimensions like it’s a warm bathtub. Somehow, they manage to understand syntax, semantics, reasoning—even jokes. In 7,000-dimensional embeddings. What?

Here’s the weird part: all the math says high-dimensional spaces are chaotic. But LLMs make those spaces coherent. Sentence embeddings cluster sensibly. Similar meanings stay close. Different ideas separate cleanly. It's like the curse of dimensionality was just politely ignored.

One theory? These models aren’t really exploring the full space. They're surfing a tiny manifold—a slim, twisty ribbon of meaning hidden inside the chaos. Another theory? Transformers are just ridiculously good at compressing, attending, and abstracting. Maybe both. Either way, they pulled off the computational equivalent of parkouring across a 10,000-dimensional pit trap.

So yeah—the curse of hyperdimensionality is real. But maybe, just maybe, if you're clever enough… you can vibe your way through it. Like LLMs did.

Back to Home

Published on: April 4, 2025